I agree Naren.
Here I would invite fellow conservationists to pitch in with the concrete ways to take it forward.
Naren mentioned about working from "the bottom rung to the apex" methodology. Okay, being part of the IT bandwagon , I was wondering if we can do the following (based on pmbok guidelines):
- Create a Project Tiger (with realistic scope and objective)
- Define constraints (time, cost, resources, etc)
- Define proper risk assessment (create strong risk mitigation & contingency plans)
- Provide strong estimation (work breakdown structure or other technique)
- Define quality benchmarks.
- Complete & sustain the project.
We have to brainstorm and collaborate with different cross-section to get the right "inputs" and look to implement it.
Purpose is to document and implement intelligent (not whimsical, utopian ideas) about conservation.
Narens' comment on Govt hoodwinking about numbers is troubling me greatly.
I would also like to caution Naren that though the tiger is a survivor, evolution has a long time-foot print. It might be too late.
We need to act.
Can somebody moderate / lead this pls?
Sabyasachi: would you suggest we create a new thread on it.
Bookmarks